The Wounded Father

In his book Finding Our Fathers, psychologist Samuel Osherson tells about a forty-two-year-old doctor who came to him with a problem. His younger brother’s wedding had brought the entire family, including their divorced parents, together in St. Louis. The physician spent most of the time with his mother to the neglect of his father who seemed isolated and distant. As the weekend ended, his father gave him a ride back to the airport. Osherson reports that his client sobbed as he reported how they traveled in silence; a father and son with nothing to say to each other. The doctor said, “I was scared of what he thought about me. But what difference does it make? It does no good to try to talk to my father.” (Osherson, 1)

The doctor is not alone in his feelings. Hosts of men have awkward and damaged relationships with their own fathers which not only cloud their past, but also shadow the present. Osherson points out that the doctor’s distance from his own father damaged his internal image of what it means to be a father. He calls that damaged image “the wounded father” (Osherson, 9).

Yet the wounded father develops not simply because a father and son don’t get along, but rather today’s wounded father is a product of a society that has degraded fatherhood and put men at odds with their children.

The Disposable Parent

Many of today’s men, like Osherson’s doctor, have grown up in a culture that has shown little support for the role of their father. Fathers have become, in the words of William Haddad and Mel Roman, “the disposable parent” (Haddad and Roman, 16-21). The industrial revolution yanked the men out of their homes and defined a father solely as a wage earner. The sexual upheaval of the 1960s and 1970s which questioned whether one man needed to stay with one woman provided many men with an exit from the parenting process (Miller. 112-13)

Modern psychology inherited a legacy from Sigmund Freud saying that many emotional problems originate under paternal authoritarianism (Terrien, 63). University of Illinois psychology professor Ross D. Parke added, “Psychology has a long history of ignoring fathers. . . . We didn’t just forget fathers by accident; we ignored them on purpose because of our assumptions that they were less important than mothers in influencing the developing child” (Parke, 4).

Notions like anthropologist Margaret Mead’s widely quoted statement, “Fathers are a biological necessity but a social accident” push men further away from their offspring. Feminist Rosemary Ruether argued against male dominance (Ruether, 74-75). In attacking men as a source of oppression, feminists further contributed to the confusion over the nature of a father.

Even popular culture with television’s prejudice-filled, anger-driven Archie Bunker, Dean Young’s inept and party crazy Dagwood Bumstead, and Sylvester Stallone’s mumbling, half-crazed Rambo character suggest that little good can come from men.

A Generation of Wounded Images

So a generation has grown up in a culture that did not support our fathers. My father was not permitted in the delivery room when I was born. My father was not allowed to hold his firstborn son, but was forced to look at me through a window. When my father picked up a parenting magazine he found it addressed to mothers.

Current fathers draw on a troubled legacy. Our fathers lived in a time when fathers were thought to be unimportant. Our fathers were taught by a female-dominated educational system where children had room mothers, but never room fathers. Our fathers had fathers who were discouraged from talking on a deep level. We had fathers who were profoundly affected by a culture deeply cynical about their position as parents.

As a result, I am part of a generation that feels considerable anxiety about being a father. The voices that urge me to be a faithful parent to my sons clamor to be heard over the internal messages that it doesn’t matter.

Search for a New Image

But being a father is important. Despite all the past baggage that lingers into the present through the wounded images we carry inside that say that dads don’t matter, being the right kind of father may be the most important thing a man ever does.

The notion that fathers are unimportant finds flat contradiction in the teaching of Jesus. Jesus didn’t lecture a great deal on the family, but he applied the father-son imagery to the most intimate relationship he had.

Jesus could have drawn on a large number of names and descriptions of God. Yet the one that he uses almost exclusively is Father. No one in Scripture surpasses Jesus in calling God Father. By calling God Father, Jesus raised fathering to fundamental significance.

He used the notion of father with the highest regard. The father-son link was important to him. He relied on it. He often spoke of the unity and love relationship that they enjoyed. The Gospels record that he often talked with God his Father.

When life became most unbearable, it was to this father that he called, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me” (Lk 22:42). On the cross Jesus invoked his father twice: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Lk 23:34), and “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” (Lk 23:46).

Even casual readers of Jesus’ story notice how important the Father was to Jesus. Jesus, unlike us, was not troubled by a tainted image of fatherhood. By exposure to Jesus, our own wounded images of fathers can be healed by watching a perfect father minister to his children.

The Nurturing Father

The most crucial statement by Jesus on fathering is Luke 6:36, where Jesus underlined not only the importance of his heavenly parent, but also his most fundamental quality. Jesus said, “Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful.” Throughout the Old Testament the people were told to “Be holy just as God is holy.” Jesus personalized God by calling him Father, and then pointed to his fundamental quality: mercy.

Jesus called him Father, not because he was a tyrant, not because he was master, not because he threw his weight around, but he used the name Father because of his mercy. He used father to convey the tenderness, the caring, the compassion, and the nurture of God.

Jesus drew on the Old Testament for this image of God. Perhaps he recalled God’s desperate plea, “When Israel was a child, I love him, and out of Egypt I called my son. . . I led them with compassion, with the bonds of love” (Hos. 11:1, 4). Surely Jesus remembered God’s words, “Is Ephraim my dear son? Is he my darling child? For as often as I speak against him, I do remember his still. Therefore my heart yearns for him; I will surely have mercy on him” (Jer. 31:20).

In a society where “daddy” has become mother’s live-in boyfriend, where “father” has been a source of irritation and anger, and where men are “wounded fathers,” these texts give new importance to the male parent and offer deeper meaning to fathering.

Steps Toward Healing the Wounds

In light of these texts, what can heirs of the wounded father image do to overcome that legacy? Begin with these three suggestions:

1—Be a present father. Some fathers desert their families. God didn’t. As Father, he never deserted his people. Some fathers become preoccupied with careers or other issues. God didn’t. As Father, he never placed anything above his people.

Memphis physician Kenyon Rainer published his autobiographical story of the demanding life of a surgeon entitled First Do No Harm. He tells that after his wife and kids left him, he arrived home one night to read the mail. He opened a letter from his daughter Laura. It said, “Dear Daddy, I miss you. I went swimming today. I can jump off the high board now. Please come soon. I love you. Laura.”

Rainer knew he couldn’t make the trip, but he decided to write to his little girl. He found a pen and some paper and had written “My dearest Laura” when the phone rang. It was the emergency room nurse calling. Rainer makes it clear the unfinished letter was not the exception, but the rule.

He had children, but he never was a father.

A few years ago before I had children, I was with a friend at a major league baseball game. It was Children’s Day. The stadium was packed. We had free tickets just beyond the third base dugout. The right-hander at bat hit a foul drive toward our section. We all stood, hoping to catch the ball, but it landed several rows behind us. As the ball shot by, I could see it hit an eight-year-old boy in the face. His mouth started to bleed. Before anybody moved to help, his father picked him up and left immediately for the First Aid booth.

I felt sorry for the little guy. But I was sure glad he had a daddy.

Be a present father.

2—Be an active father. God was. He actively worked in the nation of Israel. Jesus appealed to his Father and received immediate response.

James Muilenburg, the well-known Old Testament scholar, wrote about the wonders of divine fatherhood and found a contrast in Israel’s king David. David had children: Tamar, Amnon, Absalom, Adonijah and Solomon. As king, David had many responsibilities to fulfill but one he neglected was his role as father to his own children.

At the death of his mid-directed son Absalom, David cried out in agony, “Absalom, my son, my son.” David’s concern was heartfelt, but too late (Muilenburg, 3).

He had sons, but he never was a father.

A good friend of mine is a modern day David who has a significant job with a prestigious organization in town. He could make more money by working longer hours. But there are three people that make him do otherwise: his wife and daughter and son. This David has caught a vision of parenting that the ancient David never saw. He has a notion of the merciful father that makes him play an important role in the life of his family.

Growing numbers of cultural voices call for an active father in every family. Edward Stein in Fathering: Fact or Fable? asserts. “Psychological fathering . . . is what the world is in need of more than ever in its history. There is a considerable body of scholarly evidence that civilization will stand or fall with whether such fathering is available in sufficient quantity” (Stein, 11).

Be an active father.

3—Be a nurturing father. God was. Even when God’s people alienated themselves from him, he sought to treat them with compassion and mercy. Jesus appealed to his Father in those times when he needed care and concern.

Children need fathers so badly that Harvard psychiatrist James Herzog calls it “father hunger” (Herzog, 163-74). Psychologists have recently decided that a nurturing father helps in three crucial ways: enabling the baby to become independent of the mother, helping the child to learn control, and aiding in positive gender development (Miller, 112-13).

Even feminists have called for the nurturing father. Dorothy Dinnerstein’s, The Mermaid and the Minotaur laments the way in which mothers have been left to nurture the family and calls for an active male role in parenting (Dinnerstein, 4-5, 208).

One father told about a time when his son didn’t want him to kiss him goodnight. The father wasn’t sure what to do, so he didn’t press the issue. Later he told his boy, “I’ve been thinking about you not wanting me to kiss you goodnight. I’m willing to go along with that, but I need a substitute action. Is there some way I can tell you that I love you? Would it be acceptable if I squeeze your shoulder?” The boy said okay.

From then on the father didn’t kiss him goodnight, but he always squeezed his shoulder. That went on for years. Then one night the father left the boy’s room without the usual gesture of affection. The boy asked, “What’s wrong, Dad?” The father responded, “What do you mean?” His son said, “You know, you didn’t grab my shoulder the way you always do.”

The father had learned to nurture his son and it made a difference to the boy.

Be a nurturing father.

Rebuilding a Culture

The voice of Scripture must be allowed to rebuild the image of father. Those of us with wounded images of fathering must recast the notion of father into a form that says love and compassion. We must be fathers who are there, who are active and who nurture our youth.

However imperfect our image of a father might have been, the Father offers a perfect image of what a father should be. In that formula is the way to healing.

Newsweek recently ran a story on fathering. One father told the reporter that when he takes care of his kids on weekends, his friend sometimes say, “Oh you’re babysitting.”

“No, I’m not,” he replies. “I’m being their father” (Jones, 6).

The wound has been healed!

References

Dinnerstein, Dorothy. The Mermaid and the Minataur (New York: Harper Colophon, 1977).

Haddad, Williams and Mel Roman, The Disposable Parent (New York: Penguin Books, 1979).

Herzog, James. “On Father Hunger,” in Father and Child: Developmental and Clinical Perspectives, ed. by Stanley Cath, et al, (Boston: Little, Brown, 1982) 163-74.

Jones, Timothy. “The Daddy Track, “ Christianity Today 33 (June 16, 1989) 6.

Mead, Margaret. “A Cultural Anthropologist’s Approach to Maternal Deprivation,” in Deprivation of Maternal Care: A Reassessment of Its Effects (Geneva: WHO, 1962).

Miller, John W. Biblical Faith and Fathering—Why We Call God “Father” (Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist, 1989).

Muilenburg, James. “A Meditation on Divine Fatherhood,” Union Seminary Quarterly Review, 6 no 1 (1950) 3-5.

Osherson, Samuel. Finding Our Fathers—The Unfinished Business of Manhood (New York: Free Press, 1986).

Parke, Ross D. Fathers (Cambridge: Harvard, 1981).

Rainer, Kenyon. First Do No Harm (New York: Random House, 1987).

Ruether, Rosemary. New Woman-New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation (New York: Crossraoad, 1975).

Stein, Edward V. Fathering: Fact or Fable? (Nashville; Abingdon, 1977).

Terrien, Samuel. Till the Heart Sings—Biblical Theology of Manhood and Womanhood (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985).

It’s not about the fish

Posted by: Harold Shank in Preaching 1 Comment »

When the Book of Jonah comes up, most people think of the fish.  The fish plays a dominant role in the Veggies Tale version of the Old Testament minor prophet.  Church art tends to focus on the whale.  Apologists seek to find a fish big enough to hold Jonah.

But the four chapter prophet is not about the fish.  The book’s 48 verses refer to the fish four times in three different verses.  God is mentioned 38 times in 28 verses.  

Everything in the book does what God wants.  God speaks and the storm starts, intensifies and stops.  The fish swallows and vomits on God’s command.  When the Ninevites hear God’s word, they repent and fast.   The plant grows and shades exactly as God asks.  The worm eats and kills per the LORD’s instructions.   God tells the wind to blow and blister and it does just that.  Even Jonah who drags his feet ends up being the means by which a ship full of sailors worship the Lord and a city of wicked people believe in God.   God tells Jonah to go preach and he does.

While Jonah may lack in practice, he perfects in his theology.  He tells his struggling shipmates, ”I am a Hebrew; and I fear the LORD, the God of heaven, who made the sea and the dry land”  (Jon 1:9). 

Jonah tells us about God who rules over heaven and earth.

The world’s Jonahs distract us.   They push their own agenda (see Jonah 4:1f).  They seek their own comfort (see Jonah 1:2f).  They respond negatively when they don’t get their own way (See Jonah 4 again).  

 But God has his way, even with Jonah. 

The Book of Jonah is not about the great wicked city of Nineveh.  It is not about the plant that grows up over night as if it were nurtured in pure Miracle Grow.   It’s not about the worm that “smites” the plant like a Superworm.  It’s not about a fish that can swallow but not digest the praying prophet. 

It’s not about what we can’t do.  It’s not about the mission being too big, wickedness too entrenched, the dream too risky, the project too expensive.  The Jonahs around us remind us of all those things.

It’s not about the fish.

It’s about God.

Thoughts about leadership

Posted by: Harold Shank in Church Leadership 1 Comment »

PML

In the offices of the ministers at a church that I served, we all had a silver frame with the letters “PML.”   The “P” was tiny, the “M” was bigger and the “L” dominated the threesome by its size.

 The letters stand for “Production,” “Management,” and “Leadership.”  We found PML in Stephen Covey’s book First Things First (p 249).  The frame with the three letters was a reminder about our ministry. 

 P.  All people need to be involved in “production.”  We reasoned that teaching Sunday school, preparing a dish for a shut in, setting up chairs in the fellowship hall, and writing sermons were all good ways to be productive in God’s work.

 M.   We had another saying among our staff that we should “administer so others could minister.”  By doing the planning work on a mission trip, or organizing a work day or getting folks to set up the fellowship hall chairs others came and plugged into substantive labor for God.  As staff we did that work so that many could serve.  Ministers also manage.

 L.   Teaching and dreaming play a significant role in church life.  God calls us to be more than we are, to do more than we thought we could do, and to be available as his tools in our world.  Another one of our sayings was “The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.”   That’s the role of leaders.   They keep God’s will and God’s dreams alive.  Ministers lead.

 Yet while ministers play all three of these roles, they are not all equal.  All must be producers.   Many have the quality to manage.  Others are gifted as leaders.   

Yet our tendency is to spend all our time on producing, less time on management and little time on leadership.  By the size of the letters we reminded ourselves that the reverse needed attention.  If there are no managers appropriately organizing a ministry, then the production work becomes more difficult.  As it becomes more difficult, fewer people want to do it, and those who remain are overwhelmed with production.  Better management means more production.

 Yet managers can lose focus, get weary, or miss the big picture.   When they do production suffers.  Leaders help them stay on track.  Leaders motivate all to be involved.   If the mangers lose sight of the vision, then organization turns to chaos.  When that happens people drop out of doing productive work.  In the end, the one who might have cast the vision ends up doing most of the management and the bulk of the production.

 The three letters reminded us to feel good up setting up chairs or preparing a lesson.  Production pleases God.  We also had to allow time to be managers so that others could come alongside us as producers.   God calls us to involve folks in ministry.  But the real point kept us focused on being leaders so that the managers managed and the producers produced.

 Make yourself a frame with the three letters.  Or better yet make a call to organize the project so others can help out.  Best of all pass on the word to keep the vision alive.

Six Word Stories

Posted by: Harold Shank in Books, Preaching 2 Comments »

Maybe you’ve heard about six word stories.  Use a half dozen words that tell a story.  Here are a couple from other web sites:

  • For sale.  Baby shoes.  Never worn.  (by Ernest Hemingway)
  •  Wasted day.  Wasted life.  Dessert please.
  •  Best friend.  One winner.  Jealously kills.
  •  Driving. Cow in road.  Hamburgers tonight.
  • She loved again. I never did.
  • Blind man dreams in full color
  • Failed SAT. Lost scholarship.  Invented rocket

Not bad.

Recently the class in Joshua to Nehemiah at Oklahoma Christian University took up the task of writing six word stories that summarized the amazing books of 1 & 2 Chronicles.   Here is what they wrote:

  • From God. Left God.   He forgives
  • Adam is man, God is needed
  • Kingdom roller coaster, awaits final touches
  • God’s plan rejected, enslaved, Messiah anticipated
  • Adam sinned, the rest is His-story
  • Learning to cope.  Left with hope.
  • Israel follows God, Israel repents, repeat.
  • Genealogy. Blessed kings. Taken for granted.
  • History of failure to present success.
  • Sparksnotes of the Old Testament
  • From, with, for, and by God
  • The Old Testament, the sequel.
  • The Old Testament strikes back.

 Not bad. 

What six words would you use to summarize Chronicles?

Hope

Posted by: Harold Shank in Essays 1 Comment »

Everybody is looking for hope.  We all want some reason to go on.  Every sermon and class and book would do well to offer hope.

Recently in a class on Jeremiah, the group dove into chapters 30-32, the book of consolation, where Jeremiah gives great hope.  I asked the students to try some creative writing on the issue of hope.  One of the students, Kyle Beard, submitted this poem.   Of all the submissions, my judges ranked this one the best. 

I hope it gives  you hope.

HOPE

By Kyle Beard

A woman standing on the seashore,
searching the horizon.
A man listening intently to the radio,
to hear the announcer’s voice.
A child impatiently waiting for Christmas,
wondering what was in the big tall present.
A mother sitting by the phone late at night,
waiting for it to ring.
A girl getting ready in her room,
staring at the mirror.
A man on one knee,
waiting for an answer.
A woman in the bathroom,
Looking for a sign.
A firefighter at the station,
Playing cards with the guys.
An elderly couple,
going to sleep.
A businessman at the office,
watching the time go by.
A man sitting his the chair,
With the jury filing back in.
A mother in the waiting room,
holding her husband’s hand.
A man on his knees,
pleading for GOD’s forgiveness.
Yahweh telling his people,
To turn around.